Welcome to the DFO World Wiki. With many major updates since the release of DFO, many items are missing. Visit Item Database Project to learn more.
Please remember to click "show preview" before saving the page.
Thanks for the updated logo snafuPop!

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Female Mage Avatar Items"

From DFO World Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with 'I wonder, does it have to say Female? I mean it's not like there's going to be a male mage anytime soon :3. - ~~~~')
 
m
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I wonder, does it have to say Female? I mean it's not like there's going to be a male mage anytime soon :3. - [[User:HellMuT|HellMuT]] 03:34, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 
I wonder, does it have to say Female? I mean it's not like there's going to be a male mage anytime soon :3. - [[User:HellMuT|HellMuT]] 03:34, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 +
:Sake of consistency..?! If there are going to be pages named "Male Gunner Avatar Items" and "Female Gunner Avatar Items", why not stick gender specification in front of the others as well? :> --[[User:Revi|Revi]] 22:02, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
==equipped items==
 +
 +
I think there should be pictures of this.  Mind if I take screenshots from the avatar simulator and then post them? -- [[User:Ladywinter|Ladywinter]] 23:47, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 +
black miniskirt sample: [[image:Picture_1.png]]
 +
:I guess if you can format it nicely. We can always just put the sets that nexon puts up. -[[User:Tea|Tea]] 02:20, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 +
::I can't find a way to format the pictures in properly, but if you can find a way, that'd be great. To be honest, I think it would be best to use the sets that Nexon puts up as they're in sets. Perhaps having a page with the equipped avatars would be better in the long run, since there's going to be a ton of images in these pages which will be bad for people with slower browsers. [[User:Mistreil|Mistreil]] 02:53, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 +
:::hmm I'm liking the set idea as I'm trying out formats do.  I think you guys are right and that's the way to go.  We could probably even just take screenshots from the avatar place. -- [[User:Ladywinter|Ladywinter]] 07:36, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 +
:::: I'm guessing a table like this might work best? Of course, all the characters would be different. Or would you prefer the headings go horizontally (er. Set equipped | Avatars in set | Set Equipped | Avatars in set etc). We could probably just make one page for all the classes; and I couldn't figure out what the titles should be per row, so modify it or something if you need to. [[User:Mistreil|Mistreil]] 17:15, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 +
{|class=wikitable width="900px" style="text-align:center;"
 +
|-
 +
| width="100px" style="background-color:#ddffcf;" | '''Set Equipped'''
 +
| width="100px" | [[image:Picture_1.png]]
 +
| width="100px" | [[image:Picture_1.png]]
 +
| width="100px" | [[image:Picture_1.png]]
 +
| width="100px" | [[image:Picture_1.png]]
 +
| width="100px" | [[image:Picture_1.png]]
 +
| width="100px" | [[image:Picture_1.png]]
 +
| width="100px" | [[image:Picture_1.png]]
 +
| width="100px" | [[image:Picture_1.png]]
 +
|-
 +
| style="background-color:#ddffcf;" | '''Avatars in Set'''
 +
|
 +
* hatname
 +
* hairname
 +
* shirtname
 +
* etcetc
 +
|
 +
* hatname
 +
* hairname
 +
* shirtname
 +
* etcetc
 +
|
 +
* hatname
 +
* hairname
 +
* shirtname
 +
* etcetc
 +
|
 +
* hatname
 +
* hairname
 +
* shirtname
 +
* etcetc
 +
|
 +
* hatname
 +
* hairname
 +
* shirtname
 +
* etcetc
 +
|
 +
* hatname
 +
* hairname
 +
* shirtname
 +
* etcetc
 +
|
 +
* hatname
 +
* hairname
 +
* shirtname
 +
* etcetc
 +
|
 +
* hatname
 +
* hairname
 +
* shirtname
 +
* etcetc
 +
|}
 +
==Availability==
 +
Me and Revi were having a discussion on whether there should be a date posted in YYYY/MM/DD (or reversed) for items that aren't available anymore, when they were removed and such (ex. 2009/11/18) for people who are.. curious. [[User:Mistreil|Mistreil]] 02:53, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 +
:That sounds like a good idea. I prefer MM/DD/YYYY though. o_o; -[[User:Tea|Tea]] 03:36, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:15, 21 November 2009

I wonder, does it have to say Female? I mean it's not like there's going to be a male mage anytime soon :3. - HellMuT 03:34, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Sake of consistency..?! If there are going to be pages named "Male Gunner Avatar Items" and "Female Gunner Avatar Items", why not stick gender specification in front of the others as well? :> --Revi 22:02, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

equipped items

I think there should be pictures of this. Mind if I take screenshots from the avatar simulator and then post them? -- Ladywinter 23:47, 20 November 2009 (UTC) black miniskirt sample: Picture 1.png

I guess if you can format it nicely. We can always just put the sets that nexon puts up. -Tea 02:20, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
I can't find a way to format the pictures in properly, but if you can find a way, that'd be great. To be honest, I think it would be best to use the sets that Nexon puts up as they're in sets. Perhaps having a page with the equipped avatars would be better in the long run, since there's going to be a ton of images in these pages which will be bad for people with slower browsers. Mistreil 02:53, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
hmm I'm liking the set idea as I'm trying out formats do. I think you guys are right and that's the way to go. We could probably even just take screenshots from the avatar place. -- Ladywinter 07:36, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm guessing a table like this might work best? Of course, all the characters would be different. Or would you prefer the headings go horizontally (er. Set equipped | Avatars in set | Set Equipped | Avatars in set etc). We could probably just make one page for all the classes; and I couldn't figure out what the titles should be per row, so modify it or something if you need to. Mistreil 17:15, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Set Equipped Picture 1.png Picture 1.png Picture 1.png Picture 1.png Picture 1.png Picture 1.png Picture 1.png Picture 1.png
Avatars in Set
  • hatname
  • hairname
  • shirtname
  • etcetc
  • hatname
  • hairname
  • shirtname
  • etcetc
  • hatname
  • hairname
  • shirtname
  • etcetc
  • hatname
  • hairname
  • shirtname
  • etcetc
  • hatname
  • hairname
  • shirtname
  • etcetc
  • hatname
  • hairname
  • shirtname
  • etcetc
  • hatname
  • hairname
  • shirtname
  • etcetc
  • hatname
  • hairname
  • shirtname
  • etcetc

Availability

Me and Revi were having a discussion on whether there should be a date posted in YYYY/MM/DD (or reversed) for items that aren't available anymore, when they were removed and such (ex. 2009/11/18) for people who are.. curious. Mistreil 02:53, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

That sounds like a good idea. I prefer MM/DD/YYYY though. o_o; -Tea 03:36, 21 November 2009 (UTC)