Talk:Main Page/Archive01

Return to Talk:Main Page

Pros and Cons?

I'm thinking we should add a pros and cons sections to each of the classes/subclasses. Anyone that can think of some should go ahead and put them on there. --Agentknife 19:33, 20 September 2009

I agree completely, I'll actually help out with this if I can. I'm not too knowledgable about the game yet though, so it may take some time. D: --Hunter9009 23:51, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Okay, great, i'll go ahead and think some up and make a Pros and Cons list in discussion on the classes to add some ideas for. -- Agentknife 19:53, 23 September 2009

Nice work on them so far, mage is most developed currently, priest I think needs to be worked on more. --Shadofrak 21:25, 11 October 2009

Forgot about fighter which didin't even have pros and cons untill I put it there about 30 seconds ago, not sure how accurate my info was either, but its a start. Shadofrak 21:55

A small thing that bother me

The gunner link is under the picture compared to the others, whose link is next to the picture. It's the only one that's like that so it would look better if someone could edit it's fixed. --Doomreaper33 02:51, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

I agree. ^^ --Lite 20:00, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

It looks fine to me. I think it's because your screen resolution is low. The only way to can fix it is by making the font smaller or put it sideways. --Tea 04:48, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Name Suggestion

It should be NeoPle. --Bumble 14:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Thanks. --Uchocobo 16:03, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

We Have Competition! O.O

Looks like the other wiki somewhat ahead with formatting. We should copy their formating later on (*just like mabiguru+mabinogiworld* lol), and overtake them lol. Their wiki is more pleasant to view imo. http://wiki.dfosource.com --Hengsheng120 14:30, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Since the beginning of Mabinogi World Wiki, our admin team's motto always have been work hard on our contents. Personally I don't find it amusing having content to copy paste without a single effort involved. Plus, don't drag the wiki into this whole "competition" business. There isn't one to begin with, and their admin's ultimate goal and our admin's goal completely differ. --Uchocobo 16:58, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Can you explain the different goals of the two wikis? I'm confused. If there are common goals, I think that we should all work together to make a single wiki with quality information. I'm looking forward to contribute to both wikis and do not know how to make them unique. Otherwise, "competition" comes naturally over time (and eventually, one of the wikis will become less used/abandoned). --Hengsheng120 18:26, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Frankly speaking, I'm open to the idea of how all of us should be working together on a single wiki. Unfortunately, the truth wasn't that pleasant once we started out with Mabinogi World Wiki first. Most of the collaboration requests from other admins we've received were nothing more than "We want your content, hand it over so we can profit." Even the idea of having NA fansite union was neglected due to the other admins disliking it being non-profit and rejection of their collaboration offer. In our side's definition, content of wiki doesn't belong to admins/moderators. It is solely property of the community itself, as every contributors put their effort in constructing it. Since we are also involving contents from foreign fansites, it is crucial to keep our transparency of being non-profit web community. None of the admins earned single cent thus far. In fact, I've been spending my own pocket money and time since I treat wiki activity as a hobby. With this in mind, the admin of the site you mentioned has no intention to abide by this conduct... at least last time I encountered him due to unpleasant incident. You can search old threads in the forums if you are curious. And yes, if there are committed group of individuals working on DFO wiki that has better potential with right set of mind, I'm even willing to "hand over" the contents for work together to construct a wiki with high quality information for all players. For related discussion for this, let's take it to the forums next time instead. =/ --Uchocobo 02:28, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Most of their format looks like it was taken from mabiguru. I'm not a fan of their format. -Tea 19:45, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Their website looks bad(no offense). They don't really have an organized thing. If they are just going to let their "monster" thing sit there with about 3 or 4 things, and then more are added, its going to get bad(still, no offense). I don't like their formatting. I viewed the classes page, and there was a lot of incomplete info. Their quest page looks messy too. In my opinion, I think this is a better page.---Regards, TechnicalDeath 05:11, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Item Shop

Should there be a link to the Item Shop section on the front page? It is under the Game System category after all. HellMuT 2:22, 12 October 2009

Auth given, freely edit as you please. --Uchocobo 03:12, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Should we have an item section too?

Sometimes we just need items....and their descriptions. An item section could work pretty well, and would help people find all the stuff they want and list their price (NPC bought). Maybe it could show the location of where to buy the item. It could even include an average damage count(the weapon damages are not fixed).---Regards, TechnicalDeath 03:50, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

There is already a weapon category, but it is very underdeveloped and only has weapons of lv25 and higher last time i checked it. I haven't seen a consumables or armor section yet. shadofrak Oct 20

I'll be adding consumables the next couple of days, started with HP potions and will work my way through. -- Ladywinter 15:06, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Map

Can we have Category:Towns linked to] under Wiki Navagation in Game System? -- Ladywinter 18:40, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Auth given, freely edit it as you please. --Uchocobo 03:12, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

oh wow, thanks! -- Ladywinter 04:19, 29 October 2009 (UTC)